From a DailyKos diary on February 3rd entitled “Orly Taitz Loses Birther Case To An Empty Table.”
“The court decision is in: http://www.scribd.com/…
I guess with that hairdo her tin-foil hat won't stay on.
Orly Taitz represented one of four plaintiffs challenging President Obama’s eligibility for placement on the Democratic ballot in Georgia. The President and his counsel were subpoenaed to appear in court to defend against these challenges, but the President’s attorney issued a nice letter to the judge stating that the Court had no business or jurisdiction even hearing the case and therefore the defense would not be in attendance.
So Taitz and her fellow attorneys presented their best arguments without challenge from the defense, and requested a summary judgment on the merits.
And the Court’s judgment: the plaintiffs have no case and no credible evidence, and there is no law to support their claims. Judgment for the defendant, represented only by an empty table, on the merits. Or in this case, utter lack thereof.”
How many times now have the birthers lost in court? It’s obvious that this judge - like all the others who’ve had to deal with this lunacy - found no credibility in the rantings of Orly Taitz and company.
One of the comments on this diary summed it up perfectly “Orly Taitz has wasted enough judges’ time. Her next day in court should be a sanity hearing.”